Downing Street has refused to rule out sending weapons to the Syrian rebels, despite MPs last week failing to back the possibility of military action in the country.
![]()
Take a good look at this bastard David Cameron, he's Obama's side kick. Cameron wants to send arms to the rebels in Syria now, because the UK voted against going in to Syria with America. We all now know that Obama is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, and we also know that the rebels is Syria are with the Muslim Brotherhood. It is the rebels who killed all those people with the nerve gas, and it was Obama who sent the rebels millions of dollars to buy the nerve gas, to use and to blame Assad for it. Obama wants the Muslim Brotherhood to rule Syria, just like he wanted the Brotherhood to rule Egypt. Obama wants Muslim rule, and it will be America next, and Cameron the moron, is a traitor just the same as Obama is, and they are going to be taking us in to world war three, because if America attacks Syria, then Russia will attack Saudi Arabia, and it will all be because of Obama the Muslim, and Cameron the idiot.
Cameron has continued to come under pressure from senior Conservatives who do not want him to rule out returning to the Commons if the situation in Syria changes dramatically David Cameron has insisted that he will not return to the Commons and ask MPs to again vote on military intervention in Syria.
However, despite stressing that “no decision has been taken”, the Prime Minister’s official spokesman failed to exclude the option of instead sending arms to the Syrian opposition. It came after Barack Obama, the US President, said that he wants to “upgrade the capabilities” of the forces opposing Bashar al-Assad, the Syrian president. “On the question of arming the rebels … the position on that is entirely unchanged,” Mr Cameron's spokesman said. “No decision has been taken.
” He confirmed that any plans to arm the rebels would have to be put to MPs in a Commons vote. Dozens of Tory MPs are firmly opposed to the prospect of arming the rebels and any attempt to do so would prove divisive.
Mr Cameron has continued to come under pressure from senior Conservatives who do not want him to rule out returning to the Commons if the situation in Syria changes dramatically. Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, said that Parliament should “think again” about whether to intervene in Syria if the US Congress backs military action. Mr Johnson warned that it would be “wrong” not to punish the Assad regime for an alleged chemical weapons attack in Damascus last month, which killed 1,429 people including 426.
Asked what could be achieved by bombing Syria, Mr Johnson told LBC radio: “It will show that in the end, when a tyrant decides to use unlawful weapons, gas, to murder innocent civilians, we will not stand idly by.” The Prime Minister has insisted that Britain is not doing “nothing” in Syria despite last week’s Commons defeat. He highlighted the UK’s aid contributions and said the money being sent to Syria is saving “tens of thousands of lives”. “Parliament spoke very clearly and it’s important to respect the view of Parliament and so I’m not planning to return to Parliament to ask again about British military action,” Mr Cameron said.
“That doesn’t mean we do nothing on Syria – we are already the second largest aid donor.” He said that “Britain, as ever, is a world leader on helping those who need help, and the people of Syria are right at the front of that now”. The Prime Minister has that he will use this week’s G20 meeting in Russia to push for a diplomatic solution in Syria. A number of ministers this week appeared to leave the door open to a second vote in Parliament. Philip Hammond, the Defence Secretary, on Monday raised the prospect of MPs voting again if the “circumstances change very significantly”.
![]()
![]()
William Hague, the Foreign Secretary, said the “House has made its decision” but would only go as far as saying that the Government is “not planning to return to the same vote or the same debate again” Karl McCartney, the Tory MP for Lincoln, warned that Parliament’s failure to support plans for military intervention would “embolden Assad and his forces”. Mr Hague replied: “Something else that we must never stop are our diplomatic efforts. We have promoted, as have other nations, a second conference in Geneva. “There is still an overwhelming case for the holding of a peace conference in Geneva and we will work towards that.”
William Hague, the Foreign Secretary - "the House has made its decision" but would only go as far as saying that "the Government is not planning to return to the same vote or the same debate again.
David Miliband calls for 'intervention' in Syria David Miliband has indicated that he believes some form of intervention in Syria is “increasingly necessary”, in comments which have been interpreted as being at odds with those of his brother, the Labour leader. Mr Miliband warned that Syria risks becoming a “dangerous no-man’s land” like Afghanistan as the crisis in the country continues. “It is clear that, while international engagement is decreasingly popular in the advanced democracies, a multipolar world makes it increasingly necessary,” he said in an article for the Financial Times. Ed Miliband last week ordered his backbench MPs to vote against a Government motion that would have paved the way for military action in Syria.
![]()
Miliband last week ordered his backbench MPs to vote against a Government motion that would have paved the way for military action in Syria David Miliband, who was defeated by his brother in the 2010 Labour leadership contest, earlier this year quit the Commons to become the chief executive of a charity in New York. “Humanitarian intervention is about human need, not political sides – but it has political consequences,” Mr Miliband added in his article. “There is capacity to save more lives, but this needs resources and political will. The drums of war are reason to redouble humanitarian efforts, not forget them.” He insisted that "none of the military options being canvassed – or, in the UK, rejected – promises a decisive shift in the course of the conflict".
Miliband last week ordered his backbench MPs to vote against a Government motion that would have paved the way for military action in Syria David Miliband, who was defeated by his brother in the 2010 Labour leadership contest, earlier this year quit the Commons to become the chief executive of a charity in New York. “Humanitarian intervention is about human need, not political sides – but it has political consequences,” Mr Miliband added in his article. “There is capacity to save more lives, but this needs resources and political will. The drums of war are reason to redouble humanitarian efforts, not forget them.” He insisted that "none of the military options being canvassed – or, in the UK, rejected – promises a decisive shift in the course of the conflict".
Cameron has continued to come under pressure from senior Conservatives who do not want him to rule out returning to the Commons if the situation in Syria changes dramatically David Cameron has insisted that he will not return to the Commons and ask MPs to again vote on military intervention in Syria.
However, despite stressing that “no decision has been taken”, the Prime Minister’s official spokesman failed to exclude the option of instead sending arms to the Syrian opposition. It came after Barack Obama, the US President, said that he wants to “upgrade the capabilities” of the forces opposing Bashar al-Assad, the Syrian president. “On the question of arming the rebels … the position on that is entirely unchanged,” Mr Cameron's spokesman said. “No decision has been taken.
” He confirmed that any plans to arm the rebels would have to be put to MPs in a Commons vote. Dozens of Tory MPs are firmly opposed to the prospect of arming the rebels and any attempt to do so would prove divisive.
Mr Cameron has continued to come under pressure from senior Conservatives who do not want him to rule out returning to the Commons if the situation in Syria changes dramatically. Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, said that Parliament should “think again” about whether to intervene in Syria if the US Congress backs military action. Mr Johnson warned that it would be “wrong” not to punish the Assad regime for an alleged chemical weapons attack in Damascus last month, which killed 1,429 people including 426.
Asked what could be achieved by bombing Syria, Mr Johnson told LBC radio: “It will show that in the end, when a tyrant decides to use unlawful weapons, gas, to murder innocent civilians, we will not stand idly by.” The Prime Minister has insisted that Britain is not doing “nothing” in Syria despite last week’s Commons defeat. He highlighted the UK’s aid contributions and said the money being sent to Syria is saving “tens of thousands of lives”. “Parliament spoke very clearly and it’s important to respect the view of Parliament and so I’m not planning to return to Parliament to ask again about British military action,” Mr Cameron said.
“That doesn’t mean we do nothing on Syria – we are already the second largest aid donor.” He said that “Britain, as ever, is a world leader on helping those who need help, and the people of Syria are right at the front of that now”. The Prime Minister has that he will use this week’s G20 meeting in Russia to push for a diplomatic solution in Syria. A number of ministers this week appeared to leave the door open to a second vote in Parliament. Philip Hammond, the Defence Secretary, on Monday raised the prospect of MPs voting again if the “circumstances change very significantly”.
William Hague, the Foreign Secretary, said the “House has made its decision” but would only go as far as saying that the Government is “not planning to return to the same vote or the same debate again” Karl McCartney, the Tory MP for Lincoln, warned that Parliament’s failure to support plans for military intervention would “embolden Assad and his forces”. Mr Hague replied: “Something else that we must never stop are our diplomatic efforts. We have promoted, as have other nations, a second conference in Geneva. “There is still an overwhelming case for the holding of a peace conference in Geneva and we will work towards that.”
William Hague, the Foreign Secretary - "the House has made its decision" but would only go as far as saying that "the Government is not planning to return to the same vote or the same debate again.
David Miliband calls for 'intervention' in Syria David Miliband has indicated that he believes some form of intervention in Syria is “increasingly necessary”, in comments which have been interpreted as being at odds with those of his brother, the Labour leader. Mr Miliband warned that Syria risks becoming a “dangerous no-man’s land” like Afghanistan as the crisis in the country continues. “It is clear that, while international engagement is decreasingly popular in the advanced democracies, a multipolar world makes it increasingly necessary,” he said in an article for the Financial Times. Ed Miliband last week ordered his backbench MPs to vote against a Government motion that would have paved the way for military action in Syria.
Miliband last week ordered his backbench MPs to vote against a Government motion that would have paved the way for military action in Syria David Miliband, who was defeated by his brother in the 2010 Labour leadership contest, earlier this year quit the Commons to become the chief executive of a charity in New York. “Humanitarian intervention is about human need, not political sides – but it has political consequences,” Mr Miliband added in his article. “There is capacity to save more lives, but this needs resources and political will. The drums of war are reason to redouble humanitarian efforts, not forget them.” He insisted that "none of the military options being canvassed – or, in the UK, rejected – promises a decisive shift in the course of the conflict".
Miliband last week ordered his backbench MPs to vote against a Government motion that would have paved the way for military action in Syria David Miliband, who was defeated by his brother in the 2010 Labour leadership contest, earlier this year quit the Commons to become the chief executive of a charity in New York. “Humanitarian intervention is about human need, not political sides – but it has political consequences,” Mr Miliband added in his article. “There is capacity to save more lives, but this needs resources and political will. The drums of war are reason to redouble humanitarian efforts, not forget them.” He insisted that "none of the military options being canvassed – or, in the UK, rejected – promises a decisive shift in the course of the conflict".